Custom Hobby Forum

D&D, d20 and other RPG's => Reclaiming Ralgron => RR Character Threads => Topic started by: Chrysalis on October 05, 2007, 02:07:33 PM

Title: N'nyarok
Post by: Chrysalis on October 05, 2007, 02:07:33 PM
Here is my character sheet. There still is this little problem with the ECL/Next level, but that's not very important...

http://membres.lycos.fr/dungeonpaladin/PBEM/N'nyarok.pdf

Oh, and I'm first!  :icon_cool:

PS: How do you attach a file with a post?
Title: Re: N'nyarok
Post by: Custom_Hobby on October 05, 2007, 02:14:22 PM
Only moderators can attach files (sorry nothing personal), you need to email it to eyeolas.

Nice work on the character. It is good someone has a good strength score.
Title: Re: N'nyarok
Post by: eyeolas on October 05, 2007, 02:24:36 PM
I'll put damage, effects, and anything else here:
Title: Re: N'nyarok
Post by: Fabian on October 05, 2007, 03:00:33 PM
The saves look a bit off...
Title: Re: N'nyarok
Post by: Chrysalis on October 05, 2007, 04:37:34 PM
When I realized N'nyarok had a 20 strength, I almost (almost...) considered playing a barbarian Gnoll. But ranger sounds fouler and tricky :icon_twisted:

As for the saves, it fits quite well with the "brute" aspect of the character... :icon_w00t:
Title: Re: N'nyarok
Post by: eyeolas on October 05, 2007, 04:43:22 PM
He's saying surely a 4th level ranger has better than +1 saves

He should have fort +4, ref +4, wil +1 as base saves, which means you got them slightly wrong
Title: Re: N'nyarok
Post by: Balgin Stondraeg on October 05, 2007, 04:53:58 PM
Quote from: Fabian on October 05, 2007, 03:00:33 PM
The saves look a bit off...

I thought rangers got a good reflex save too in 3.5 (they didn't in base 3rd but then they were a bit broken anyway).
Title: Re: N'nyarok
Post by: Fabian on October 05, 2007, 05:17:03 PM
Sorry I have a tendency to be circumspect in rl which carries over online... the saves are wrong, yes, but not drastically so. Hehe, I know I'd be casting charm spells at this guy with that Will save and that Strength. :dragon:

Level 4 Ranger (3.5 rules)
Fort +4 Ref +4 Will +1

Gnoll
Fort +3 Ref +0 Will +0

Stats
Con +4
Dex +3

So he should have:

Fort +11, Ref +7, Will +1

Title: Re: N'nyarok
Post by: Custom_Hobby on October 05, 2007, 05:18:20 PM
Damn those are some good Fort and Ref saves
Title: Re: N'nyarok
Post by: Balgin Stondraeg on October 05, 2007, 05:32:30 PM
Quote from: Fabian on October 05, 2007, 05:17:03 PM
Hehe, I know I'd be casting charm spells at this guy with that Will save and that Strength.

And then he'd stand there asking who you are over and over again and then spout out (through gritted teeth) "I am not a number, I am a free gnoll!" (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=14eUKogPF7s&mode=related&search=) (I linked it so the rest of you could recognise Fabian's avatar and understand a sample of my whit :)).   :clap2:
Title: Re: N'nyarok
Post by: Fabian on October 05, 2007, 05:36:45 PM
HA! Nice one.

Number 2: "We want information... information!"

Gnoll: "You won't get it!" (proceeds to bite Number 2's head off)
Title: Re: N'nyarok
Post by: Balgin Stondraeg on October 05, 2007, 05:43:27 PM
Did you ever understand the end? I never was sure if Number 6 or the silent dwarf was actualy Number 1 (although it may just have been the dwarf going back to work, that last episode with the machine guns was a bit surreal (although not as much as the one where he escaped, opened the door and stepped back into the village :)).
Title: Re: N'nyarok
Post by: Fabian on October 05, 2007, 06:00:03 PM
 :offtopic: No-one understands the end... LOL especially since McGoohan was quite staunch about his character being a thinker rather than a thug... several theories are that the ending is deliberately surreal to a) make fun of people taking the show too seriously or b) make a point about life being a cosmic joke so why not enjoy yourself rather than be trapped by society? or c) the script was pants

Number 6 is Number 1: We are all in charge of our own destiny, whether we like it or not

The butler is Number 1: Often the seemingly insignificant can have great importance

Balgin is Number 1: Well, are you? Hmm? Eh? I demand to know! :offtopic:
Title: Re: N'nyarok
Post by: Balgin Stondraeg on October 05, 2007, 06:05:20 PM
I often thought A (and occassionaly C). I think, 'though, didn't they bring up the "his face with the bars slamming shut in front of it" right at the end after he'd gone free and the butler had gone into Number 1's office? That could be sort of taken to mean that freedom is a kind of imprisonment since you are trapped into taking responsibility for your own actions (having no-one else to blame). That could fit in with the conformity thing too.

So which is the most confusing to watch? The Prisoner or Lost?
Title: Re: N'nyarok
Post by: Chrysalis on October 05, 2007, 06:05:43 PM
Quote from: Fabian on October 05, 2007, 05:17:03 PM
Sorry I have a tendency to be circumspect in rl which carries over online... the saves are wrong, yes, but not drastically so. Hehe, I know I'd be casting charm spells at this guy with that Will save and that Strength. :dragon:

Level 4 Ranger (3.5 rules)
Fort +4 Ref +4 Will +1

Gnoll
Fort +3 Ref +0 Will +0

Stats
Con +4
Dex +3

So he should have:

Fort +11, Ref +7, Will +1



You've got it guys. I realized my player handbook is 3.0  :icon_ermm:

I'll correct it.
Title: Re: N'nyarok
Post by: Balgin Stondraeg on October 05, 2007, 06:07:52 PM
Anyway gnolls are fun (and rangers changed a lot in 3.5, light armour prof only but a lot more free feats and stuff).
Title: Re: N'nyarok
Post by: Chrysalis on October 05, 2007, 06:11:58 PM
Quote from: Balgin Stondraeg on October 05, 2007, 06:07:52 PM
Anyway gnolls are fun (and rangers changed a lot in 3.5, light armour prof only but a lot more free feats and stuff).

It was either a Gnoll or a paladin.

Gnolls are much more fun!  :occasion14:
Title: Re: N'nyarok
Post by: Fabian on October 05, 2007, 06:32:07 PM
www.d20srd.org - rangers have a lot more to play with in 3.5
Title: Re: N'nyarok
Post by: Chrysalis on October 06, 2007, 02:20:11 AM
Quote from: Fabian on October 05, 2007, 06:32:07 PM
www.d20srd.org - rangers have a lot more to play with in 3.5

It means N'nyarok would have an animal companion... I don't see an emprisoned Gnoll having a pet and not eating it :icon_w00t: Maybe I'll wait to be outside before taking one...